W v F

Court:Family Court (Hong Kong)
Judgement Number:FCMC809/2004
Judgment Date:21 Jun 2004
FCMC000809/2004 W v. F






  W Petitioner
  F Respondent

Coram: H H Judge Carlson in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 18 June 2004

Date of Judgment: 21 June 2004




1. There is a dispute between these parents as to whether Q, who is aged four and who is the younger of their two sons, should attend the reception class of the Chinese International School (CIS) at the start of the next academic year which starts in late August this year. As a result, I have to make the decision for them.

2. I will refer to them as the mother and the father.

3. The father, who is English, is aged 44. He is a solicitor and has lived in Hong Kong since 1987. He came to work for a large firm of solicitors and is currently a partner of a large firm. His practice is in the field of corporate finance in which he has enjoyed great success. His earnings are said to be in the region of $7 million to $10 million per annum. As a result, the parties and their children have been able to enjoy a very comfortable way of life. They have lacked for nothing. Nevertheless, his position in the partnership is almost certain to change very significantly as a result of changes in its structure and his earnings are very likely to go down although, for present purposes, that does not really matter.

4. The mother is 42. She is a Chinese American. She was born in San Francisco and her family continue to live in the United States. She is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley and she also came to Hong Kong in 1987, when she was 25. She has had a very successful career as a newspaper journalist and on radio and television. She stopped full-time work when the parties’ first child was born. The parties were married in England in October 1996. They have three children: S who was born on 3 April 1998 and so he is now six; Q who is four, having been born on 3 April 2000, so they share the same birthday; and K their sister who will be two on 23 July.

5. For present purposes, a very brief history of the marriage will suffice. The final matrimonial home, which is presently used by the father, is a spacious and well-appointed house at Sai Kung. The parties employ two maids and a driver. The driver would drive S and Q to their present school which is in Queen’s Road East, close to Pacific Place. The father would also drive in with them to his offices in Central and the driver was also available, and I daresay still is, to drive the mother to and from school and for any other journey that she needs to take. Apart from the obvious advantages of having help at home and somebody to drive the family, they have also enjoyed the other advantages that go with the father’s earnings including a house at Chamonix and in London as well as many holidays overseas and so forth.

6. Without embarking on the complexities that contribute to the break up of a marriage, it would appear that so far as the mother is concerned, the major cause has been the father’s admitted adultery with a number of women. Attempts had been made to save the relationship in 2001 when both of them attended counselling sessions but to no avail.

7. Things came to a head late last year when the mother felt that she could not go on in view of the father’s unfaithfulness. In March this year, she took the children with her and moved to a serviced two-bedroom flat at Parkside, Pacific Place, where the monthly rent of $68,000 is...

To continue reading

Request your trial