Ho Hon Piu v Ho Hon Ka

Court:High Court (Hong Kong)
Judgement Number:HCA660/2014
Judgment Date:10 Jan 2017
HCA1966/2013 HO HON PIU v. HO HON KA

HCA 1966/2013 &
HCA 660/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1966 OF 2013 & NO 660 OF 2014

_______________

BETWEEN

HO HON PIU (何漢標) Plaintiff

and

HO HON KA (何漢嘉) Defendant
_______________
(Consolidated by Order of Master Ho dated 6 October 2014)
Before: Hon Chow J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 6-9 December 2016
Date of Judgment: 10 January 2017

__________________

J U D G M E NT

__________________

INTRODUCTION

1. Hon Piu (the plaintiff) and Hon Ka (the defendant) are brothers. Their mother passed away in 2010. Hon Piu claims that a property in North Point held in the name of Hon Ka, which was purchased in 1987 and sold in 1994, belonged beneficially to Hon Piu, Hon Ka and their mother in equal shares. Hon Piu further claims that another property in Chai Wan purchased in 1992 originally in the joint names of Hon Ka and their mother and currently held in the sole name of Hon Ka is also beneficially owned by the three of them in equal shares. On the other hand, Hon Ka claims that:-

(1) their mother’s will, executed in 2007, in which she gave the whole of her residuary estate to Hon Piu, is invalid because (a) it was not properly executed by her and/or (b) of her lack of understanding of its contents; alternatively

(2) the disposition in favour of Hon Piu under that will is invalid because the will was witnessed by his wife (and one other person).

2. The principal issues which I have to determine are as follows:-

(1) whether the North Point Property belonged beneficially to Hon Piu, Hon Ka and their mother in equal shares;

(2) whether the Chai Wan Property belongs beneficially to Hon Piu, Hon Ka and the estate of their mother in equal shares; and

(3) whether the mother’s will, alternatively the disposition in favour of Hon Piu under that will, is invalid.

Background facts

3. At the trial, Hon Piu, his wife (“Sai Mui”) and Hon Ka gave oral evidence. In addition, the parties agreed that a witness statement made by Sai Mui’s younger sister (“Sai Chun”) could be admitted as evidence without cross examination. In what follows, I shall set out what I understand to be undisputed background facts, save where otherwise expressly indicated.

(i) Family background

4. Mr Ho (the father) and Madam Chan (the mother) had two sons, namely, Hon Piu (born in 1947) and Hon Ka (born in 1950).

5. In the 1960s, the Ho family was not financially well off. Mr Ho did not work because of ill health. Madam Chan worked as a dish cleaner. Both Hon Piu and Hon Ka received primary education only and started to work to support the family since about 1963/64.

6. In around 1965, the Ho family moved into a public housing unit in Chai Wan.

7. Prior to 1967, Hon Piu worked as a messenger. In April 1967, Hon Piu joined the police force and became a police officer. He retired from the police force as a sergeant in April 2003.

8. On the other hand, in the 1960s, Hon Ka worked as an electrical apprentice. Later, he worked in different trades in Hong Kong and the Mainland until around 1994 when he became a taxi driver. Hon Ka has been working as a taxi driver up to now although, because of his current ill health, he has temporarily ceased working.

9. Mr Ho passed away in 1974.

10. Hon Piu and Sai Mui got married in 1977. Soon after their marriage, they moved to live in police married quarters in North Point.

11. In around 1989, Madam Chan retired.

12. In 1991, Hon Ka remarried in the Mainland. Hon Ka’s wife and their two daughters came to Hong Kong in about mid-1997, and they lived together with Madam Chan in the Chai Wan Property (more particularly described below).

13. In January 2010, Madam Chan passed away.

(ii) The purchase of the North Point Property

14. On 20 February 1987, Sai Mui signed a provisional agreement as agent for Hon Ka for the purchase of a property known as Flat C, 11/F, Ka Fook Court, Bedford Gardens, 151 Tin Hau Temple Road, Hong Kong (“the North Point Property”) at the price of HK$519,000. In that provisional agreement, the name of the purchaser was stated to be “Ho Hon Chiu”, an alias of “Ho Hon Ka”. “Ho Hon Ka” was also named as the purchaser in the subsequent formal sale and purchase agreement dated 4 March 1987 and assignment dated 8 May 1987.

15. As stated in the provisional agreement, an initial deposit of HK$10,000 was paid to the vendor upon the signing of that agreement, and a further deposit of HK$41,900 was payable upon the signing of the formal sale and purchase agreement on or before 4 March 1987.

16. In relation to the purchase of the North Point Property, a mortgage loan of HK$467,100 was obtained in the name of Hon Ka from HSBC repayable over a period of 15 years.

17. After the purchase of the North Point Property, it was let to three sisters of Sai Mui, namely, Sai Chun, Sai Hing and Sai Ha initially at the rent of HK$2,500 per month which was subsequently increased to HK$3,000 per month in around 1991.

(iii) The purchase of the Chai Wan Property

18. On 2 May 1992, Madam Chan and Hon Ka entered into a formal agreement for the purchase of Flat J, 11/F, Block 3, Fullview Garden, 18 Siu Sai Wan Road, Hong Kong (“the Chai Wan Property”), a Home Ownership Scheme flat, as joint tenants at the price of HK$750,700. As stated in the formal agreement, a deposit of HK$37,535 was paid upon the signing of that agreement, and the balance of the purchase price in the sum HK$713,165 was payable upon completion.

19. The purchase of the Chai Wan Property was completed on 29 March 1993. It was used as Madam Chan and Hon Ka’s residence. According to Hon Piu and Sai Mui, Madam Chan and Hon Ka moved in to the Chai Wan Property on 15 March 1993. On the other hand, Hon Ka said that they moved in after completion of the purchase of the Chai Wan Property, which took place on 29 March 1993.

(iv) The sale of the North Point Property

20. On 21 February 1994, Sai Mui entered into a provisional agreement as agent for Hon Ka for the sale of the North Point Property at the price of HK$2,400,000. Out of the proceeds of sale, approximately HK$400,000 was used to discharge the outstanding mortgage loan in relation to the North Point Property, and HK$800,000 was used to discharge the outstanding mortgage loan in relation to the Chai Wan Property, leaving a balance of HK$1,200,000. The sale of the North Point Property was completed on 31 March 1994.

21. Out of the balance of HK$1,200,000, Hon Ka paid HK$200,000 to Hon Piu. Hon Piu’s case is that the HK$200,000 represented a portion of his entitlement to the proceeds of sale of the North Point Property, whereas Hon Ka’s case is that he...

To continue reading

Request your trial